Reference for Bava Kamma 112:6

אמר לך רבא מאי מסרו לרועה לברזיליה דאורחיה דרועה למימסר לברזיליה

and the first bailee would be exempt altogether. Would this not be a refutation of Raba? For did Raba not say: One bailee handing over his charge to another bailee becomes liable for all consequences?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even for accidents, as he had no right to hand over his charge to another person without the consent of the owner, v. supra 11b. ');">⁶</span>

Jastrow